Martes, Disyembre 6, 2011

The AQ Test

                          My AQ TEST Score is : 16


Agree: 19,39,41,42,43,45,46: 1 point
Disagree: 1,3,8,14,24,27,29,34,50: 1 point
Score: 16


Reaction:


I’ve been curious about myself for quite some time, since being introduced into all things Autism but have not been able to get in for any real testing/diagnosis.

I've take the  test and I have scored 16 .  I really see the questions there quiet very interesting. It really reflects  the real me.

Probably the ESTJ classification of mine for the result of Jung Topology test is somewhat there is a connection of this AQ test. But with this test, I knew that there is something unconscious with my behavior in terms of socializing people.


Explanation:

Systemizing quotient is 22. I am more interested in how people work. Not objects.Mind in the eyes score is 19. Autism score is 29. 23 - 31 = above average

Systemizing quotient score: 42 above average (most people with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism score in this range)

The Empathy quotient test had some sort of error in it.Autism Spectrum quotient score: 18 average (most women score about 15 and most men score about 17) The mind in the eyes score: 27 A typical score is in the range 22-30


REFERENCE:

http://similarminds.com/jung/estj.html

JUNG Topology result

My type is:

                             ESTJ

Strength of the preferences %


Extraverted - 78%


Sensing - 38%


Thinking - 25%


Judging - 44%










Qualitative analysis of your type formula




 You are:
  • very expressed extravert
  • moderately expressed sensing personality
  • moderately expressed thinking personality
  • moderately expressed judging personality



Explaination :



ESTJ (Extraversion, Sensing, Thinking, Judgment) is an abbreviation used in the publications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) to refer to one of sixteen personality types.[1] The MBTI assessment was developed from the work of prominent psychiatrist Carl G. Jung in his book Psychological Types. Jung proposed a psychological typology based on the theories of cognitive functions that he developed through his clinical observations.
From Jung's work, others developed psychological typologies. Jungian personality assessments include the MBTI assessment, developed by Isabel Briggs Myers and Katharine Cook Briggs, and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter, developed by David Keirsey. Keirsey referred to ESTJs as Supervisors, one of the four types belonging to the temperament he called the Guardian. ESTJs account for about 8–12% of the population.







ESTJ (Extraverted, Sensing, Thinking, Judging)is an abbreviation used in the publications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) to refer  to one of the sixteen personality types.




ESTJs are very much in touch with the external environment. They know their community and usually are pillars of strength. The best adjective to describe ESTJs would be responsible.


ESTJs thrive on order and continuity. Being extraverted, their focus involves organization of people, which translates into supervision. While ENTJs enjoy organizing and mobilizing people according to their own theories and tactically based agendas, ESTJs are content to enforce "the rules," often dictated by tradition or handed down from a higher authority.









Expressed Extraverted :

It a person calmly outgoing but still enjoys time to themselves without being bother by others. They do not require attention but does not shy away for it either. open and can express things. Reserved but still outgoing.
An extravert or extrovert is a lively and outgoing person. See the related link for more information.




 Extraverted Thinking :


Thinking in this auxiliary role is a workhorse. Closure is the payoff for efforts expended. Evaluation begs diagnosis; product drives process. As they come to light, Thinking tends, protects, affirms and directs intuition's offspring, fully equipping them for fulfilling and useful lives. A faithful pedagogue, Thinking argues not so much on its own behalf, but in defense of its charges. And through this process these impressionable ideas take on the likeness of their master.


 Extraverted Sensing:

Sensing serves with a good will, or not at all. As other inferior functions, it has only a rudimentary awareness of context, amount or degree. Thus INTJs sweat the details or, at times, omit them. "I've made up my mind, don't confuse me with the facts" could well have been said by an INTJ on a mission. Sensing's extraverted attitude is evident in this type's bent to savor sensations rather than to merely categorize them. Indiscretions of indulgence are likely an expression of the unconscious vengeance of the inferior.




 Extraverted Judging:


It is a social form of judgement, in that it is defined by the external world, rather than by an inner sense of right and wrong. It is not swayed by individual appeals -- it believes wholeheartedly in the merit of the Principle. If the Principle exists, then it should be followed.You exhibit your judging through your orderliness and your desire to promptly settle or complete things. You like to bring things to a conclusion and are always looking for a way to make that happen.

REACTION:


                                                     THE STRATEGIST"

INTJs are introspective, analytical, determined persons with natural leadership ability. Being reserved, they prefer to stay in the background while leading. Strategic, knowledgable and adaptable, INTJs are talented in bringing ideas from conception to reality. They expect perfection from themselves as well as others and are comfortable with the leadership of another so long as they are competent. INTJs can also be described as decisive, open-minded, self-confident, attentive, theoretical and pragmatic. 


    Famous ESTJs:
  • Elliot Ness
  • John D. Rockefeller
  • Bette Davis
  • Robert A. Taft (U.S. senator, son of Pres. Wm. H. Taft)
  • Sam Walton, owner and founder of WalMart stores
  • Barbara Stanwyck
  • Rev. Billy Graham
  • Dale Bumpers (U.S. Senator, D-Arkansas)
  • Phil Fulmer, head football coach of the U. Tenn Vols
  • Robert Packwood (U.S. Senator)

    U.S. Presidents:
  • James Monroe
  • Andrew Jackson
  • William Henry "Tippecanoe" Harrison
  • Franklin Pierce
  • Grover Cleveland
  • Harry S. Truman
  • Lyndon B. Johnson

    Fictional:
  • Lucy (Charles Schultz's Peanuts character)
  • Mrs. Harbottle (Herriott, All Creatures Great and Small)
  • Mrs. Rachel Lynde (Anne of Green Gables)
  • The Mayor (The Music Man)

Huwebes, Agosto 25, 2011


   "Pirates of Silicon Valley" my Response...




It was my first time watching that movie .. This is the short overview of what happened in that movie..



“Pirates of Silicon Valley” was a film based on a historical fact regarding on Steve Jobs and how Apple got started and also about Bill Gates and how Microsoft got started. The movie then proceeds to narrate the events that led to the development of the first Apple computer. The movie is called Pirates of Silicon Valley because it is about piracy in the computer world and Silicon Valley is a place in California where computers are built. Bill Gates and Steve Jobs performed many unethical actions during the beginnings of Microsoft and Apple.

Noah Wyle and Anthony Michael Hall did excellent jobs of getting the "look and feel" of their characters' real-life personas, Anthony Michael Hall in his portrayal of Bill Gates. From the voice to the posture, and to the facial expressions, it was a very excellent portrayal.

The movie did not particularly display either character in a very favorable light. Mr. Gates is played by Anthony Michael Hall as a fixated person bent on world domination at any price while he sells products he does not yet own. Mr. Gates also accuses Jobs of not "getting it" because it didn't matter whose product was better. Bill Gates also showed a nerd character who was then a nobody and even got ignored by Steve Jobs in a computer expo.

Noah Wyle's role as Steve Jobs focuses on darker sides of Mr. Jobs including hi abusiveness, drugs, and especially his reaction to his illegitimate daughter which he denies is his. Noah does effectively capture the genius of Mr. Jobs while simultaneously showing his "mercurial" side.

The story then narrates how competition flared between the two leading companies and how they strived to outwit each other and finally, concluding in the scene where Steve Jobs and Bill Gates announced that they are good together.

In my opinion the real protagonist of the story was Steve Jobs not only because he got featured more in the film but also I admire his determination to uplift the name of Apple. Sure, he got some attitude problem going on but he did become successful, right? He also had flair in talking people into something but you really would not want to cross him when he’s angry or everything will just come exploding. 

It was 70% of the movie focused on Apple and Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniac. Very little effort was put into Microsoft outside of Bill Gates’ Harvard days with his friends and soon to be fellow executives Steve Balmer and Paul Allen.

In the movie Steve Jobs split his company, Apple into two camps. One the old Apple computer camp, and the other the new Macintosh development camp. After seeing this effect on the company, Steve Jobs is forced to leave his position at Apple. Years later the movie picks up with Steve Jobs back in command of Apple who now has partnered with Microsoft and Bill Gates.
Really a short summary of the story…right?

The bottom line of my reaction in this movie, all I can state...

I was enlightened and more informed regarding on some added information on the origin of personal computers. It’s also a matter of values reflected in the movie. Companionship between Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniac, and Bill Gates and his friends. Conviction that their idea and insistence will make it to the pinnacle of success. Appreciative cooperation in their respective organization, considering you are dealing different kinds of people with different personality and capacity.

But there’s a negative attitude to be point out. It teaches me one thing; you should not be arrogant in whatever soaring accomplishments you will have. Because you will never know what the future will holds, sometimes those who are not considered before might be the one who will succeed more in their striving endeavor. Just maintain a humble profile and you don’t need to hurt someone’s feelings just to focus on your own interest, a good explanation will be a good step, and consider other people’s point of view. Because in an organization, it’s not only a matter of one brain functioning in, it’s sharing of idea and information in the organization to make it immense and successful. 

But everyone deserves a second chance, and it’s a matter of coping, not just only on your determination to succeed again but also most especially on altering your unconstructive character. Because we cannot alter our lives by not altering our unconstructive attitudes.

And this is my response regarding on that movie…